Parchester
Village Residents Fight to Preserve Breuner Marsh, Open Space
By TOMIO GERON Special to the Planet (November
12, 2004)
On a hill rising high above San Pablo Bay,
Whitney Dotson stared out at an expanse of marshland along the
eastern shore and could still see himself and his brother, Richard,
as kids swimming in the grassy marsh channels in the early 1960s.

Dotson,
who grew up and lives in historically African American Parchester
Village nearby, is one of multiple generations of African Americans
who have spent time in Breuner Marsh and now want to preserve
the land.
Sharply dressed in a green shirt and small round sunglasses,
the stout, 59-year-old community activist gave tours of Breuner
Marsh and nearby Point Pinole on a recent Saturday at a Richmond
Shoreline Festival, which included a barbecue and live band.
The festival was part of an ongoing struggle between the landowners,
who want to develop the 238-acre plot of land on the North Richmond
Shoreline, and festival organizers, including Parchester Village
residents and environmentalists, who want to protect it as open
space.
"It's become a very important amenity," he said. "Just
having the serenity of this whole area and being removed from
the larger city."
Bay Area Wetlands LLC, the company that purchased the land in
2000, is fielding bids from developers for the site. Meanwhile,
environmentalists want to protect an extremely rare undeveloped
marshland along San Francisco Bay, as well as its endangered
species.
"From the Sierra Club's perspective, so much of the bay
has been filled and so much of the wetlands have been lost," said
Jonna Papaefthimiou of the San Francisco Bay Sierra Club and
the North Richmond Shoreline Open Space Alliance. The alliance,
which organized the shoreline festival, was formed last year
to preserve Breuner Marsh.
Residents of nearby Parchester Village want to protect the environment,
but also want to see Breuner Marsh, which lies just across the
railroad tracks from the predominantly African American community,
protected for their community.
Parchester Village was developed after World War II for African
Americans who moved to Richmond to work in the shipyards and
could not buy houses elsewhere. It was built on the donated land
of founder Fred Parr, a white developer. Local residents say
that it is the first African American homeowners' community in
the Bay Area. About 1,000 people live in 400 single-family, one-story
homes on this small tract sandwiched between two railroad tracks.
It has remained mostly black since it was built, though some
Latino families have moved in recently.
Whitney Dotson's father, the late Reverend Richard Daniel Dotson,
was one of the early settlers in Parchester in 1950 and became
a community leader, organizing to preserve Breuner Marsh and
helping to get adjacent Point Pinole turned over to the East
Bay Regional Park District.
For years, Whitney Dotson remembers, he and other Parchester
young people would hop the railroad tracks and trudge through
the pickleweed to get to the marsh channels for swimming. During
the 1970s, however, the channels were illegally filled in. But
even after that, Breuner Marsh has been a de facto park for residents,
said Dotson.
"Every generation of people in Parchester have found some
way to use that space," said Dotson. "There's a number
of kids over the years who have gone fishing, playing, just observing
the wildlife."
Open space is rare in Richmond. Predominantly African-American
Northern Richmond, which includes Parchester, has one-third as
much open space per capita as Contra Costa County per capita,
according to a study by the Oakland-based Pacific Institute.
"If you could see all the development along the shore that's
been off limits to us," said Henry Clark, director of the
West County Toxics Coalition and a well-known activist against
toxic pollution in Richmond. "We want access to Breuner
Marsh and the shoreline. The land should be held as a public
trust for the people."
Meanwhile, the City of Richmond, with a $35 million budget deficit,
needs new revenue desperately. Richmond City Councilmembers,
whose approval is required for any development, are waiting to
see what Bay Area Wetlands does.
"Breuner Marsh is a beautiful piece of property and it
really deserves to be protected," said City Councilmember
Maria Viramontes. "And it connects to a large park space
at Point Pinole, it creates a unique opportunity to enlarge that
park."
Viramontes believe that there is room for a small development
on an adjacent area next to Richmond Parkway. However, such a
development would depend on what happens with the Breuner property.
"I think most of the [City] Council is pretty clear we
want to keep it as open space," she said.
Dotson said he is not opposed to a small restaurant or educational
center near Breuner Marsh.
Newly elected first-time City Councilmember
Gayle McLaughlin, who also attended the festival, believes
that open space is the best use for the space. "If we develop what little open
space we have left," she said, "we're going to be in
an even worse place in terms of public health."
Contra Costa County Supervisor John Gioia has also publicly
supported keeping the space open.
The land, formerly owned by the Breuner furniture company, has
been the subject of battles at least since the 1970s. Gerry Breuner,
the former owner, came to stay on the property for weekends or
longer vacations, according to Toni Silva, who rented out a cottage
on the property from Breuner from late-1980 to 1983.
"It was nice," she said. "He
had a tiny pier. We used to go fishing and catch bass and flounder."
The quaint marsh, complete with occasional duck hunters and
horses that grazed the land, was almost developed when Breuner
tried to build a small private airport on the site in the 1970s.
According to Silva, this grew out of Breuner's serious hobby:
airplanes. That plan took concerted effort by Parchester residents
and environmentalists to shoot down-with residents like Whitney
Dotson's father leading the way.
After Breuner died, his family eventually sold the property
in 2000 for approximately $3 million.
The current owner, Bay Area Wetlands LLC, and its agent, San
Jose-based real estate developer Stan Davis, have in recent years
tried different options to sell the land. One plan to build an
Edgewater Technology Park came under opposition from Parchester
and environmentalists, and was scrapped.
Then Signature Properties bought a six-month
option on the site and sought to build housing. But the developer
could not get the City Council to re-zone the site from "Open Space-Light
Industrial," to residential, so Signature dropped out as
well. The City wanted revenue-generating commercial development,
not residential development that would require revenue-draining
services.
Environmentalists, including the Richmond Environmental Defense
Fund, Golden Gate Audubon Society, Save the Bay and others, say
that there are very few remaining undeveloped areas along the
bay and they are intent on protecting this swath of land. The
California clapper rail, a small reddish-brown bird, and the
tiny salt marsh harvest mouse are two animals living in Breuner
Marsh that are on the federal endangered species list.
Richmond residents also deserve the open
space, Papaefthimiou of the Sierra Club said. "Most of the Richmond shoreline
has been lost to Chevron or the Navy or another industrial company," she
said. "Even though they have a huge shoreline, most is polluted
or not accessible to the public."
The lack of open space in Richmond is
an environmental justice issue and a form of racial discrimination,
said Clark of the Toxics Coalition. "This is on a spiritual level-being by
the water. Not having that access is an attack on the life and
well-being of this community. We're likely to do whatever is
necessary-even to possibly occupying the Breuner Marsh area," he
said, adding that he hopes that that does not happen.
The importance Clark places on the struggle over Breuner Marsh
speaks to the unusual nature of this environmental battle in
Richmond-in that it is an effort to keep open space, rather than
the usual one to shut down or stop some major toxic threat.
Talks about the site are now heating up again, as Bay Area Wetlands
seeks to sell the property. Environmentalists and Parchester
activists want the East Bay Regional Park District to purchase
the land, and the agency has made an offer, said Brad Olson,
its environmental program manager.
"We've offered to purchase the property," he said. "The
property owner is not willing to sell at this point." The
parks district owns over 95,000 acres in 65 parks, recreation
areas and shorelines and is seeking to add new lands.
Bay Area Wetlands wants to get higher than the market value
for the property, and the park district can only purchase it
at the currently appraised price, said Olson.
Olson would not comment on how much the parks district bid.
Don Carr, a resident of Napa and one
of the owners of the property, would not comment on discussions
with potential buyers. "We
haven't solidified plans yet," he said.
Carr dismissed the concerns of residents
and activists who want to keep the land from being developed. "You know when UC
Berkeley was built there were people lobbying at that time not
to build it," he said. "There's always people saying
things. That's not news. In fact there were a lot of people who
didn't want the Bay Bridge."
Stan Davis of Bay Area Wetlands would not comment.
According to Olson, Bay Area Wetlands is weighing at least one
other private company's offer and also has been waiting to see
what happens with another major Richmond shoreline development
at Point Molate.
On Tuesday, Richmond approved selling that property to Upstream
Point Molate LLC to build a casino and resort. Even with City
Council approval, the outcome of that development is far from
clear, with numerous other state and federal approvals needed.
But with that deal now approved, and a value now placed on that
shoreline property to compare to the Breuner site, a Breuner
sale could move forward.
Olson, for his part, says that if the
EBRPD were to acquire the property, the site would remain open
space. He thinks the chances of any major development on the
site are "pretty
slim."
"If the [new] proposal is anything like the other concepts-either
a large commercial or housing development-there's going to be
a lot of opposition from the local community and environmental
community," he said.
However, the City Council's approval of the Point Molate casino
indicate that development on Richmond open land such as Breuner
Marsh is definitely possible-especially if it brings jobs. Activists
against development do have two points going for them that Point
Molate did not-first, the Breuner property, is close to residential
areas such as Parchester, and secondly, the Breuner site has
a history of development deals being shot down by community pressure.
Meanwhile, Whitney Dotson hopes Breuner Marsh will be available
to his grandchildren and other nearby residents. He imagines
them having similar trips out to the marsh, like the ones he
had with his brother and friends, enjoying the wildlife and forgetting,
for a few minutes, the imposing city nearby. |